Accelerate player development, scouting, and analytics without the risks of sloppy AI. We provide safe, transparent AI solutions.

Plena is a system that generates auditable reports for player development, scouting, and analytics while learning from staff feedback. We emphasize ease of use, reliability, AI transparency, and staff control for every report.

Easy to read numbers

Easy to read numbers.

We turn stats into performance, trends, and recommendations for your team.

Prepare for your upcoming opponent

Reliable intel.

We equip you with trustworthy intel ahead of every matchup.

Develop and track player growth over time

Stay in control.

You always have the last say — not generic, static templates.

01 · Scope

An intelligence layer for sports.

Plena is built for extracting intel from information you have. It's not trying to do everything — just to be the best intel layer for winning in basketball there is.

Plena provides
  • Report generation across a library of player development and scouting categories
  • Report editing
  • Report downloads
  • Transparency and human control over how the AI works
  • Privacy and security — control what others can and can't see
  • Team engagement with reports — your players and staff can read and comment reports
  • Document uploads
Plena does not provide
  • Full-game video storage and backup
  • Pulling stats from full-game video or extensive manual annotation
02 · How it works

From your information to an auditable report.

Plena analyzes your existing data, reasons over it using specialized AI, and delivers reports anyone can use. It's like having PhD-level analysts available 24/7 — at a fraction of the cost.

01 · INPUT
Season stats
Scouting notes
Research papers
02 · PROCESS
Think through
Critique & disprove
Improve
03 · DELIVER
Individual player development reports
Opposition reports
Team self-scout
RELIABILITY
Plena analyses and uses the information you provided. No fabricated stats. No random summaries.
SYSTEMATIC PROCESS
Specialized units of Plena handle analysis, advanced reasoning, and narrative synthesis — then compose the final report.
HUMAN CONTROL
Coaching staff, not Plena, have the last say. Every report can be edited, traced back, and audited.
03 · What you see

Four report types. You can always edit them.

Every report is generated from your information, cites its sources, and passes through your staff before it's final for players to engage. Below: an actual Player Development report structure, produced by Plena.

Player Development
01
Strengths, weaknesses, and growth trajectory from in-game data.
Combine Testing
02
Percentile rankings across 10 physical and athletic metrics.
Opposition Scouting
03
Opponent threats, personnel tendencies, game plan priorities.
Team Self-Scout
04
Internal tendencies, vulnerabilities, and opponent attack vectors.
12 CITATIONS · VERIFIED
plena.ai / reports / player-development / marcelo-smith
PLAYER DEVELOPMENT REPORT
Marcelo Smith
#34 · 17 games
MPG
17.9
GAMES
17
PLUS / MINUS
+121
PLAYER SUMMARY
Marcelo is an elite impact player whose presence on the court drastically improves team performance. While he excels as an interior scorer and active defender, improving his ball security and shooting efficiency will elevate his overall game.
TRUE SHOOTING
45.8%
Below average — focus on shot selection
USAGE RATE
13.6%
Selective — efficient touches matter more
NET RATING
39.7
Elite impact — team significantly better on-court
SCORING IDENTITY
Paint scorer — finishes inside
75%
16%
31%
Paint (75%)Off Turnovers (16%)Second Chance (31%)
04 · Transparency

Plena's aim is to not make things up. Ever.

General AI tools in the market invent statistics and attribute them to real players. Plena does not. This is the single most important difference for any program considering AI in their workflow.

Every claim traces back to a source.

When Plena writes "Marcelo converts 77.6% from the free-throw line," that number is not recalled from the AI's training data like generic tools. It's from your information, and there is a link to the claim. In every report, you can verify where it came from.

This is applied rigorously throughout the reports, with internal tools for audits.

  • Source-level tracking on every numeric claim
  • Source document provided in every report
  • Confidence scores for where claims in reports come from
Example · Claim with provenance
Marcelo's free-throw conversion of 77.6% S1 sits well above the team average of 68.4% S2, a strong baseline for closing late-game possessions S3.
S1 See information
S2 See provider
S3 Report information
01

Reports in minutes.

Spend less time analyzing data and more time on what matters most: your players and your team.

02

Elevate your team.

Give players and staff reliable reports they actually love to read.

03

Stay ahead of the curve.

Plena is a research and development company built by PhD researchers. We're always implementing the latest to make sports intelligence better.

05 · How Plena stacks up

An honest comparison.

Not every AI tool is built for the realities of a program. Here's how Plena compares to the main alternatives.

 Just HumansHumans + ChatGPTOther AI toolsPlena — todayPlena — at 4 months
Factual accuracyAccurate but limited by analyst bandwidth and available film timeInvents stats and player names not in the source — AI fills gaps with plausible fictionSame fabrication risk — generic tools have no access to your actual documentsEvery output is sourced from your own documents — no fabricated dataAccuracy improves further as the system learns the patterns of your program
Staff workload8–12 hrs per opponent report; fully manual — every season starts from scratchStaff still locate, copy, and paste source material by hand — the inefficiency moves, it doesn't disappearPartially automated but requires manual document prep every sessionInformation ingested automatically; staff time goes to reviewing and approving, not analysing from scratchReport generation accelerates as the system recognizes recurring patterns without being asked to
Full season of documentsAnalyst must hold be organized and do it manually — limited by memory and timeHard reading-limit means full season logs cannot be processed at onceSame hard limit applies — most tools hit this ceiling with any substantial librarySmart research process pulls only the relevant information from your full library — no ceilingSources become more precise over time as the system builds a deeper understanding
Staff feedbackImplicit — experienced analysts improve, but knowledge walks out with staff turnoverNo structured mechanism — corrections lost at end of each session; every report starts coldCorrections not retained between reportsStaff edits are reinforce in reports — the system learns your standardsFeedback is learned as a permanent layer of your program's philosophy
Improves over timeOnly if the same staff remains and works hardGeneric AI is taught to do many things, but at the end of the day, they are still generic Other AI tools don't learn your system, terminology, or standardsLearns from every report cyclePlena builds a deep fingerprint of your program, and the more you use it, the more helpful it becomes

See Plena work on your data.

We're adding programs every week. Join the list to get access.